Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Boy games in the Castlevania series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn.  Non-admin closure. MuZemike 16:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Game Boy games in the Castlevania series

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is the result of a sudden merge without consensus of four different articles, none of which have been argued to not assert notability or even have a merge discussion put in place. Given that independent reviews can be found for each, conglomerating them into one mega-page solely on the grounds they all appeared on the Game Boy is a bit of a stretch, and results in a rather unnecessary article. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Withdrawn in favor of a redirect.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * comment Im inclined to agree with kung fu man. Ive been searching for an indication as to why the merge has taken place. As far as i could tell most of the original articles were well sourced and significant in size on their own. Had consensus been asked I probably would have opposed the merge. That said I am curious if there was a discussion for consensus, or some kinda of project related initiative. It would be good to hear from the author of the article as well, before deciding where to go with this. Ottawa4ever (talk) 02:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Seems kind of unnecessary for an AfD; you could have merely reverted my edits and turned it into a redirect to the Castlevania series. Unnecessary redirect, but it's simpler than the AfD process. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I didn't consider that. Withdrawing nomination and changing to a redirect.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.