Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Zero magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Game Zero magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic about a video game magazine fails WP:GNG. Additionally, opinion regarding the notability of media on Wikipedia can be read at the essay Notability (media). Google Books only yields passing mentions, and Google News archives search yields no results other than the article's Wikipedia page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  03:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  03:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  03:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Unable to find reliable sources that discuss the magazine in-depth. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 05:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I could not find significant coverage of the magazine in any reliable source. Delete per WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unfortunately, Google News and Books hasn't provided anything that is relevant or not Wikipedia. The lack of sources is probably because it was published for a short period of time and it seems the external link provided has been abandoned. The archived content at the website suggests this magazine existed but likely never received attention and nothing about the magazine itself though it seems this wasn't a professional magazine either. My last resort, I searched the main Google engine and found one email which provides very little use. SwisterTwister   talk  05:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.