Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game moments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 16:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Game moments

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page with no context or indication of the notability of this concept. The only references are to articles by Dr Kelvin Wong (cited on the page as Wong, K.K.L), and the article creator's username is Kelvinwongk. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 18:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it was created from Game moments via a copy-and-paste move:

--Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 17:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – No context, no notability established, no intro, no reliable sources. This is not academic journal. Kingjeff (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Accept – The page is still under construction and will prove its worth later on. The references are valid. Kelvinwongk (talk) 17:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.95.80.189 (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

PAGE''' ]] ) 15:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep. This article is unfinished and the author should be given a chance to flesh it out a little more. He should be reminded not to excessively cite his own work, and we should revisit this after more references have been provided. Note this was nominated for deletion within one hour of being created. --Sammy1339 (talk) 16:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability, and we have AfC, the Draft namespace, and user space for articles that aren't yet finished. I wouldn't object to userfying the article, but I still can't find any indication that the term "Game moments" is at all notable, and all the cited sources not authored by the editor of the article are about Bargaining problems in general. Without evidence that anyone other than the author is using this term in this context, I can't see how this article is notable. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK


 * Suggestion – If changed the key subject header to "Moment (game theory)" now, all the contents related to this input will disappear. Can someone please advise what can be done? Actually, it should be "game moment" that is singular. User:Kelvinwongk|Kelvinwongk]] (talk) 01:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ahecht - doesn't seem to be used widely enough for notability. ansh666 17:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Accept – It is now renamed as "Moment (game theory)", except that I could not move the page and had to copy and paste over. Can an administrator please help me transfer the contents? User:Kelvinwongk|Kelvinwongk]] (talk) 02:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have history-merged the cut-&-paste. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. There might be a notable concept there, but what is in the article is all Wong's views, and other comments about loosely related topics; and Wong's views are clearly not significant in the field.  Furthermore, the copy-paste move has damaged the integrity of the edit histories to the point that starting over would be an improvements. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 19:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I found this AfD through the edit on cooperative game adding a pointer to it. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Suggestion – The concept is published in two journal articles and my colleagues and co-workers use the suggested conventions to publish their own works now. The page is useful to researchers in the combinatorial optimization field of research. More contents on the applications with detailed methods will be provided in due course by my co-workers. It is going to restart the whole editing process again if this page is deleted. The notable terms as mentioned by the WP:TNT are taken into account seriously and addressed as detailed in the talk session of the main page. Kelvinwongk (talk) 12:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.112.42.60 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.