Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game sweatshop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep, snowball clause; invalid nomination criteria. JERRY talk contribs 02:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Game sweatshop

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Has been sitting too long, needs a delete or a merge, or a complete rewrite Something X (talk) 01:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Needing improvement isn't a valid reason for deletion. Rray (talk) 01:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No valid reason for delete, article is well sourced. Suggest this is closed under the snowball cause -- neon white user page talk 02:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep WP:SNOW!!! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see no notability concerns with this article -- the external links indicate there's extensive mainstream news coverage of the subject, so there's no reason whatsoever to delete or merge it. A complete rewrite is not a valid AfD argument, and it's really bad form to bring an article to AfD just to prod it into cleaning up. Especially since, per official policy, it doesn't matter how long it takes to improve it, and AfD is too danged choked up dealing with, yanno, actual deletion issues. Obvious keep. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.