Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game teens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Linuxbeak | Talk 22:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Game teens

 * A website with no evidence of significance. Friday (talk) 18:35, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Being a teenager with a website about videogames isn't significant enough for you??? Me either.  Delete.--Isotope23 18:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete website promotion. no useful content.-71.28.243.246 18:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not speediable, though. RasputinAXP   talk  *  contribs  19:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * deleteBEST Sight EVER this wuz my vote sum otha faggit changed it first look at the history u will see tha mystery (preceding unsigned comment by --JiFish(Talk/Contrib))
 * My mistake, I was confused by the fact User:69.193.44.60 edited your vote later on. But please observe WP:CIVIL. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 12:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep!!!the website doesn't only have to deal with video games it is much deeper then that. You may go on our forums and ask the game teens community yourself! There is a bunch of websites on wikipedia. The Game Teens community does not want to be excluded because it may be fairly new and what not! Please, give me a good reason why a website just because it has more people involved with it should stay on here rather then a smaller site?.-- 23:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC) (preceding unsigned comment by --JiFish(Talk/Contrib))
 * Delete as non-notable vanity. Note that the anon who posted above as ezz2talk2 just made a very bad faith afd nomination at Final Fantasy, presumably to prove a WP:POINT... --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * NOTE: The anon above also deleted my vote without comment. Any anonymous editors of this page should be made aware that it is considered VERY bad form to delete other editors' votes.  --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I love the site and think that the article deserves to stay. (preceding unsigned comment by --JiFish(Talk/Contrib))
 * Your opinion might hold more weight if you hadn't deleted a vote from this AfD and submitted a bad-faith AfD nomination yourself. Oh, and you have voted three times. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 00:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Site made in self-promotion. Articles about websites in Wikipedia are, for the most part, either influential, and/or have/had some kind of significance to a large community. I have just looked at the site myself, and it is obviously not an already well-established website to have met any such criterias yet to be deemed notable for an 'encyclopedic' article. Shadowolf 08:49, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: User:69.193.44.60 now also edited my comments in an attempt to make his three votes look like they are from seperate IPs. I have reverted. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 20:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Promotion, with no real content. Author has been adding competing site pages to the AfD list as well.  Trisk 22:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable site. Don't even have their own domain, but use a free host instead. bjelleklang 02:09, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.