Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamecaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as per consensus. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Gamecaster

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Small company page, original author has not yet written an additional article to provide context. TheProphet92 (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Speedy Keep -- sources provide plenty of significant coverage and are reliable. The fact that the author has not written a second article is irrelevant and not sufficient criteria for deletion. Recommend a speedy keep as the article covers both WP:RS and WP:N and the nomination does not provide sufficient reason for AfD. Additionally plenty of other reliable, significant refs can be found in a two minute Google search. --Teancum (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - perfectly fine sourcing from major publishers. I do not understand the nominator's delete rationale. Marasmusine (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient coverage from reliable source already present in the article. Pcap ping  03:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.