Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameknight999 (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:G7. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Gameknight999 (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable character in a book, fails WP:GNG. Esquivalience t 12:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

The book series is very popular and is available in stores,so the article is still a little good--Minedigger (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note - I have added Crafter (character) to this AFD. It is another character from the same book that also fails GNG.  -- GB fan 14:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete both as there is no evidence these characters are notable. -- GB fan 14:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible (A7?) - Unremarkable characters from an unremarkable book. The thing is, the "book" appears to be fanfiction(?) about Minecraft. If this could be speedied, it should be done so. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * A7 does not apply to fictional characters and no other speedy deletion criterion applies either, so they are not speedy deletable. -- GB fan 17:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete both Character from a book not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete both Ok I give up--Minedigger (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Per the comment above this one I have tagged both articles for speedy deletion under G7. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.