Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamem8ker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Page has been protected from recreation. Dunc|&#9786; 17:59, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Gamem8ker
This page has been deleted several times and has reappeared again, it's pretty obvious it should be deleted Corey.spring 01:34, August 21, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete --Revolución (talk) 02:01, 21 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep this page it is part of something important that the X-Box community is working on.

(''unsigned comment by 69.225.203.153. This person also blanked corey spring's comment) (UTC)
 * Delete take it to the sandbox if you want to work on it. Hamster Sandwich 02:04, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Unexplained, nonsense.  -maclean25 02:43, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vague (indeed, nonsensical) statements written backwards do not an encyclopedia article make. Fipe 04:40, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per maclean25. --Apyule 05:19, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Dottore So 06:01, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy, K1Bond007 06:03, August 21, 2005
 * DONT DELETE, if you don't like it, stay off it. This is needed. stay out of things you don't understand.

I have protected the page, because a large number of anons and new users have repeatedly vandalized the page, including repeatedly removing the VfD header. Zoe 07:35, August 21, 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as recreation of deleted material. --TheMidnighters 09:54, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, as per TheMidnighters' suggestion. --Agamemnon2 10:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete, this is an interesting site, and that's an interesting puzzle, sry I don't know howto comment so I'm editing this page --RoCKy
 * Speedy Delete as per TheMidnighters' suggestion. --Lomedae 12:30, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The talk page says it's part of a marketing campaign, so not only is it rubbish and not encyclopaedic, it's an ad. Cursive 14:09, 21 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.