Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameplay of The Sims 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Gameplay of The Sims 3

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nearly everything in the article is either original research, material more appropriate for strategy guides, or stuff that is already in The Sims 3. Hence, this goes against What Wikipedia is not on several aspects. –MuZemike 22:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  –MuZemike 22:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I concur. Delete, although the content might be suitable on some Wikia or other. DS (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * We have gameplay articles of a bunch of other games, why not this one? Zach Vega (talk) 01:03, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR trivia. If sources do exist, then the sourced material belongs in the parent article per unwarranted WP:SPLIT and WP:CSPLIT. Subtopics like this are made when there is enough sourced material to cover, or it spans several games, like Gameplay of The Elder Scrolls series. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 07:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - OR/Gameguide issues. Sergecross73   msg me   15:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect - does not have to be deleted, should rather be redirected to the Sims 3 article. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It's usually what's done if that's a likely redirect, even if everyone !votes "delete". — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 07:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.