Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamer Hands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 14:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Gamer Hands

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Technopat (talk) 02:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Doesn't seem very encyclopaedic and only reference is a chat/blog. --Technopat (talk) 02:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Is not Urban Dictionary. mboverload @  02:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Agreed. This is what Wikipedia is not Vartanza (talk) 02:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This should really have been speedily deleted. -- Rockstone  talk to me!   03:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not disagreeing: Which criterion? --mboverload @ 03:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * G3 as a blatant hoax. I think. Shall I put a CSD? -- Rockstone  talk to me!   02:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete.  Anna Lincoln  08:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no indication that this term is notable and can't find any coverage in reliable sources that would satisfy WP:GNG. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 17:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete per all of the above. Quite frankly, I'm surprised that this article wasn't PRODed first. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 21:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. As the original AfD proposer, I thought it better to go through AfD rather than have the creator of the article simply remove the prod template. Unfortunately speedy doesn't cover these cases, or if it does... --Technopat (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.