Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamerz Heaven (forum)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. David Fuchs( talk / frog blast the vent core! ) 16:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Gamerz Heaven (forum)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This website fails WP:WEB and is extremely non-notable. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information. Delete GreenJoe 04:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it will be notable some day. In the meantime, the article looks spammy. Delete. -- Hoary 05:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - pure spam, no notability argued, concept behind it seems very unlikely to ever be able to reach notability guidelines without some major fluke of publicity somehow, and Wikipedia is not the way to try to get it. These kind of pages don't meet WP:EL guidelines, let alone full articles. DreamGuy 09:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nn-web, grotesquely non-notable. A website "created in May 2007" and doesn't even have its own domain name?!  Come on. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you people want to take a look at yourselves. The domain, for your information, is bought and we are moving to it next week. Of course the page isn't going to be up to standards yet - it was only created yesterday. So perhaps you pompus gits should realise that we took time to create a page before going flaming us (and I do know the irony of flaming you about flmaing us). Now get your heads out of your arses, and respect that we are people who want to help Wikipedia as much as you do - we just need help in doing so. If you want to help Wiki, then help improve the article rather than being complete pricks. You can ban me or do what you like to my account, but at the end of the day, you are the ones being the arseholes about the page and indeed its creators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.227.233 (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy Delete per A7. 'Is known for' is no assertion of notability. Fails WP:WEB with no independent coverage whatsoever. There are guidelines for articles, and that's what we judge articles based on. This article does not meet those guidelines for web sites. Attacking your fellow editors does not help you make your case. Read and follow WP:CIVIL. DarkAudit 14:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well perhaps if you read what they said, you would notice their attacks on me. So don't try and make it out as if I was the only one in the wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CatfireTom (talk • contribs) 14:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC).