Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games, Anime, and More


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete by author's request DES (talk) 04:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Games, Anime, and More

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is of WP:LOCAL importance and coverage as with a local art and wine festival. WP:TOOSOON to have a Wikipedia-level article. Also consider WP:ORG and notability. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment creator of article has written himself into article per WP:COI. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This convention needs to have sources to show that it is notable. One source by Vernal Express is nice but we are looking for more than that per Wikipedia's notability policy. It would be a good idea to make an article when the convention is covered by multiple news outlets, and mentions of the convention are not just announcements (ex: "Games, Anime, and More is going to be held at x at x date tickets are now being sold") or the like. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not seeing much evidence of actual notability yet. valereee (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for now at best as I reviewed this at NPP and searches simply found nothing obviously better. SwisterTwister   talk  04:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment (or however the formatting goes on these things): I can toss a bunch of links onto the page going to a bunch of articles if you want, but somehow I doubt you would find the blogs containing these articles to be 'notable.' Also there was some television coverage from VTV Channel 6 but it doesn't archive all of its videos onto its Web site nor YouTube page, only some.  Additionally there was coverage from the radio station X94 but it doesn't archive its audio. Nz17 (talk) 09:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I wish I could say "yeah sure we can go with that" but I cant. If there were mentions of this convention over at Anime News Network (non encyclopedia portion), or a national newspaper then maybe. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of notability. If this event gets wider coverage after a few years it could be added. ZettaComposer (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Relatively minor anime convention which has only been held once twice so far. A search for sources resulted mostly in brief mentions or false positives. If this becomes notable in the future, it could get an article but now is not the time. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: "which has only been held once so far." Twice so far, actually.  What is the policy about articles on people's blogs?  I could provide some of those such as http://goodmoejo.blogspot.com/2016/03/gam-con-new-website.html and http://suspendeddreamsart.blogspot.com/2015/08/sohow-was-gam-con.html and other entries from those two blogs.  Nz17 (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blog reliability is determined on a case-by-case basis. As a rule-of-thumb, if the author of the blog is a person who is an established authority in the field, whose authority has been established by peers and other sources, then the blog is notable. But neither of the blogs you've linked appear to be notable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG, fails WP:EVENT. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:11, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: So can we just kill it already? I'm tired of suffering in agony waiting for the ax to drop.  Delete the page.  There is no current dissenting opinion. Nz17 (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, I have tagged the article for speedy deletion per G7. Time to put the article out of its misery. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, there is nothing stopping you from recreating this article in the future if you can show that it has the notability through multiple reliable sources. =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.