Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamesoft Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @266  · 05:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Gamesoft Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No assertion of notability. No reliable sources with significant coverage found to back up article. Teancum (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --Teancum (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. --Teancum (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Teancum (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC) --Teancum (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. --Teancum (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Teancum (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC) --Teancum (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable organisation which created the non-notable fansite GameClub. See Articles for deletion/GameClub for relevant discussion on that topic. --Taelus (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, publishing a portal with an article is enough for A7 Majestic 27   Talk to me... 14:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The criteria for WP:AFD are not the same as WP:CSD --Teancum (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Okay I understand and I'd already read the guidelines for deletion. -- Majen27 ·  talk  02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable online publisher for which I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 17:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Non-notable company, producer of non-notable website already deleted. Pcap ping  03:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No third-party, reliable sources provided to indicate notability. Most of the websites provided in the "Reference" section are to a wiki. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 05:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.