Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamestyle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Gamestyle
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to be a popular website. And can't seem to find any information on the page so I don't think it is at all notable. GamerPro64 23:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Just to have an aside, I just discovered that this article may have been made by, who appears to have been a writer for the site. So this being a form of self-promotion looks to be the case here, too. GamerPro64 03:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NWEB. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  17:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  czar  17:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar  17:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, can't find reliable source coverage. -- ferret (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination and delete comments above. I also concur with the comments about it being self-promotional, with sentences like this in the article. Sergecross73   msg me  17:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Perhaps nothing to suggest better solid notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails Notability (web). --Guy Macon (talk) 04:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.