Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gametalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete by Physchim62 as recreation of deleted content. --GraemeL (talk) 23:28, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Gametalk
Seems to be about a page that doesn't meet some of the proposed guidelines on WP:WEB (Alexa ranking, specifically, currently at 39,381). Article itself seems to be very POV as well. Locke Cole 10:14, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - this article seems to have been VfD'd before, the only change is that now it's Gametalk and not GameTalk. Also suggest protecting the page if deleted. You can see the previous VfD discussion here: Articles for deletion/GameTalk -Locke Cole 10:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, POV. *drew 11:13, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Locke. Tagged as such. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 14:07, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. per nom. *Exeunt* Ganymead Dialogue? 15:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete/Speedy delete. Whether or not it qualifies under G4 will be determined by an admin who can compare the versions. I do not believe that this otherwise satisfies WP:V and WP:RS, so my opinion for the AFD is delete if this version isn't speediable under G4. encephalon  16:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Small note: seems you have a spurious &lt;i&gt; in your sig. :P -Locke Cole 16:57, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Although the subject matter is the same, the contents of the two articles are different. This is probably because in all three cases (GameTalk was re-created.) the article largely comprises material that appears to be the personal opinions of the authors themselves, and that is wholly unsourced. Uncle G 18:53, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.