Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GamingWithNayeem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Deleted as WP:G11 by Espresso Addict. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

GamingWithNayeem

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional, borderline G11 bio of streamer fails WP:GNG.

WP:BEFORE: One word mention for being in a tournament, various non-RS Sportskeeda coverage  A412 (Talk &bull; C) 17:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Bangladesh. A412 (Talk &bull; C) 17:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - No sources mentioned in the article. Totally this is a promotional article.
 * Showib Ahmmed (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - approaching WP:G11 levels of promotional content. Sounds like it was written by an adoring fan, or the subject itself, as it only uses first party sourcing in writing this atrociously non-neutral worded biography. Sergecross73   msg me  18:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete non notable, zero ref, fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Only reference is Spotskeeda. If subject was notable, other publications would have taken notice. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: probably qualifies as both CSD:A7 and G11. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Only sourcing found is several hits in Sportskeeda, nothing for extensive sourcing. No coverage otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 23:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't even think Sportskeeda is generally considered reliable. This isn't "borderline G11", it's G11, and I have tagged as appropriate. Kinopiko  talk 01:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.