Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Horizon

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 16:50, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Gaming Horizon
Vanity websitevertisement. From Asriel86's user page: Please note that the VFD that "decided he was significant enough" was removed by him three and a half hours after it was placed on the article, and that the subpage was never properly listed on vfd. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 07:17, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Aaron Dunlap - Me. Tee-hee. There was a VFD on it when I first posted it, but it was decided that I am significant enough of a person to have an article. Huzzah!
 * Gaming Horizon - Gaming site I work for


 * Delete. Vanity, advertisement. No significant edits other than those by User:Asriel86 - compare. --bainer 07:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I would consider it a high probability that there are wikiusers whose position of occupation have articles here. I wouldn't discredit them for that reason, or just because the article was added by someone on their first-day wikispree. The article in question is Gaming Horizon, and whatever I may have said about or however I may have missenterpreted the vfd policy regarding Aaron Dunlap should have no baring on this article. This isn't a character trial, Korath. If this article goes, so should IGN and Gamespot. Asriel86 15:26, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Err, no. Alexa rankings: IGN, 204; GameSpot, 255; Gaming Horizon, 124,297. Not a valid comparison. android&harr;talk 17:00, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, you forgot the link Grue 16:36, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Whoops, better delete the article then. (???) Updated article with links. --Asriel86 16:57, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, the link was there. I removed it per standard practice.  (Twice now.) &mdash;Korath (Talk) 22:22, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm changing my vote. Keep, valid gaming site. Grue 14:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. android&harr;talk 17:00, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree. Delete Advertisement. --Anonymous Cow 18:26, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity and advertising. --Angr/comhrá 20:48, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. RickK 23:03, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity Dsmdgold 01:12, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it's valid. &mdash; Unsigned vote by User:Tim G; user's 3rd edit, and his 1st since Dec 6, 2004.


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.