Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamla Östberga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:HEY applies thanks to Julie's work, and there seems to be consensus that is enough. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Gamla Östberga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced for twelve years and no article on Swedish Wikipedia so notability is doubtful. Mccapra (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. We're typically fairly generous when it comes to individual articles for regions and places, as long as a good argument can be made for why they should have their own article. As the Swedish article points out, Gamla Östberga is separated from Östbergahöjden with no simple way to get from one to the other by car; public transportation tend to serve both areas separately. The Stockholm City Museum did a project on Östberga, specifically mentioning a focus on Gamla Östberga and Östbergahöjden as separate entitites. I haven't got access to the exhibition or other material right now, but see the project blog. Stockholmskällan indicates that information about Gamla Östberga can be found in two books: Brännkyrka 1913-2013: socknen som blev 51 stadsdelar (ISBN 9789186853297) and Stockholm utanför tullarna: nittiosju stadsdelar i ytterstaden (ISBN 9789170311321). I haven't got access to these right now, but I've added a very basic reference to the article in the meanwhile. /Julle (talk) 15:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Julles improvements and further promised improvements. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep following Julle's improvements. I have ordered Stockholm utanför tullarna through my library and have planned to add some information from that to the article when I get the book on Monday. (As an aside, I guess Östberga could/should also have a separate article.) --bonadea contributions talk 16:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Excellent. (And if I've misunderstood what Stockholmskällan tells me about these books, and we can't verify the information, well, then maybe we can't have an article. But I find it very difficult to believe there wouldn't be proper sources for Gamla Östberga.) /Julle (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.