Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Squeeze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Short squeeze. The page history is retained for anyone wanting to merge content and references. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Gamma Squeeze

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Pretty much entirely original research and refbombing. Sourced to dubious or unreliable sources (including wikipedia articles). The vast majority of the sources do not mention gamma squeezes. Additionally, the article looks like a POV fork from short squeeze in several respects. Maybe the subject is notable (although IMO the subject's notability is not separate from short squeezes), but this version should be WP:TNTed. JBchrch  talk  03:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  JBchrch   talk  03:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  JBchrch   talk  03:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It could be redirected back to Short squeeze where the correct title currently leads to though I'd move the edit history there in any case.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Short squeeze, and leave the history for a selective merge. A lot of the content needs a TNT deletion. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 03:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.