Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandalf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was SPEEDY KEEP per WP:SNOW. Probably an error on the part of the nominator. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Gandalf

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Carl Sixsmith (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Arguably one of the most famous literary characters of the 20th century. I'm suggest a speedy closure as per WP:SNOW, especially since the nominator didn't provide any reason for the nomination. JdeJ (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Proded user on talk page to come back and provide rationale for deletion. Redfarmer (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm still recommending a speedy closure, though, as this should be a quite obvious case of notability. JdeJ (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, WP:SNOW. Unless they can come back really fast and provide a rationale that just blows our minds away, this one should be closed. Redfarmer (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: WP:SNOW, WP:POINT. By the way, guys, if no rationale is given, saying it passes WP:N is kinda silly.  What really matters is WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV... you know, policies.  There's really no reason to even bring up WP:N unless nom does. -- Masterzora (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Quite right, I agree completely. JdeJ (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keeping with WP:AGF, I'd go with this being an accidental nomination since the user did not add a header to the article page nor did they notify any contributors of the deletion. Also, they seem to be a member of WikiProject Middle-earth, so they should already know this belongs here. Redfarmer (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.