Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandarpur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   09:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Gandarpur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no references to support the significance of this village.  CatcherStorm    talk   12:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable. I have cleaned up the article and added a source. — Sam Sailor 03:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 03:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I concur with Sam and I have also added a few more references to the page.FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 16:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep -- A legally recognized village (per sources) is inherently notable. Article meets WP standards. — Cactus Writer (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Such legally or former legally recognized population centers are inherently notable. --Oakshade (talk) 04:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - As a populated place that meets WP:GEOLAND Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.