Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gander Green Lane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Gander Green Lane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unencyclopaedic cruft. Nothing in the article indicates why the subject is notable. Yes, it exists, that seems to be about all. In fact, most of the text is purely geographical. We haven't plunged the depths of listing every single retail outlet on the lane but it's getting there. I mean, who honestly cares that there's West Sutton railway station, a tinylittletinkers or Londis or Fitness4Less or North Cheam Academy of Dance or LibDems office on that lane – all of these are sourced to self-published sources. A "juicy tidbit" is about a spate of burglaries in the lane. If the lane is notable because of it, then most roads would qualify by the same logic. At best, this should redirect to the Borough Sports Ground article.  Ohc  ¡digame! 16:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect as per nom. There is no real significant coverage in reliable sources here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - contains three landmarks, Borough Sports Ground, West Sutton railway station AND St. Anthony's Hospital, London.-- Laun  chba  ller  21:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Existence does not equate with notability; Wikipedia is not a travel guide. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 14:17, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no primary topic for which we can redirect though. At least convert into a disambiguation page as has already been suggested.-- Laun  chba  ller  16:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, notability is not inherited; the fact there are notable landmarks on the road does not make the road notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Complete failure to meet notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Utterly non-notable.--Charles (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, Utter non notable crap. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  04:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable per WP:N, and also not appropriate for Wikipedia per WP:NOTTRAVEL. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.