Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandharv

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JamesTeterenko 06:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Gandharv
Blatant advertising --malathion talk 04:35, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

I think the advertising links have been removed now
 * Obvious Delete --Mysidia 04:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * CSD So many reasons I won't list them. --Apyule 05:09, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Remove the peacock words, the vanity, and the predictions of the future and there is nothing left. ManoaChild 07:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain. I don't feel qualified to judge the new version. ManoaChild 21:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.— Encephalon |  &zeta;  |  &Sigma;  07:41:32, 2005-08-10 (UTC)
 * Delete- BrainyBroad 11:06, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * I edited the Contents, not worth deleting now- I.T. 6:06, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I wikified the previous edit. Can't vouch for any accuracy in the article, but it no longer has any of the attributes that led to the original VfD listing. Delete -- didn't catch the copyvio Lomn 13:45:31, 2005-08-10 (UTC)
 * Delete the "edit" didn't exactly help, as it's now a copyvio of neither version is keepable though. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  13:48, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. --Carnildo 22:44, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.