Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhibagh.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Gandhibagh.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was reviewed at NPP but it should've been better closely examined including for AfD because aside from the apparent claim of significance in the first sentences, my searches have found nothing better. Also by closely examining this article, it shows that although there's the apparent claim, there's nothing else actually convincing and simply insinuates it's locally known thus not yet acceptable. Also note related articles and connected AfDs, Swetank Gupta and Swetank gupta. Notifying the nominator of the other AfD,. SwisterTwister  talk  01:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Clearly non-notable and highly promo article. Honestly, I think it could be speedied G11. Waggie (talk)


 * Delete – Per source searches, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:WEBCRIT or WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 01:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet requirements of wp:gng. Search for significant coverage in reliable sources results in negative findings.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  22:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Purely promotional. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  06:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.