Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhigiri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete; merging at editorial discretion. Sandstein 08:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Gandhigiri

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article is on a 'newly-coined neologism', a criterion for deletion. Please do not forget that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It is recommended that some part of this article be merged into Lage Raho Munna Bhai, especially that United States Citizenship and Immigration Services bit. See WP:NEO. Ranvir Sena 09:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with Lage Raho Munna Bhai and delete. Sarvagnya 10:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Week Merge with Lage Raho Munna Bhai, and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services per Ranvir Sena; this was rather newsworthy several weeks back., ,, , etc. etc. Zidel333
 * Delete - the article admits that its a neologism. Bigdaddy1981 16:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   Baka  man  00:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Merge with Gandhism or Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Just a recent fad which is already fading away from popular culture. -- Agεθ020 ( ΔT  •  ФC ) 00:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I wouldn't have thought so, but the article seems to be a bout a notable subject, and adequately documented. DGG (talk) 07:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is well referenced and is on a notable subject.Shyamsunder 20:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Notable subject'? Who/what is the subject of the article? If you think 'Gandhi' is, then why not redirect it to the synonym of the neologism 'Gandhigiri' to 'Gandhism'? You can merge Gandhigiri to Gandhism. That would be the best decision. Defending such newly-coined neologisms would encourage people to start more and more articles on not-at-all notable subjects. -- Ranvir Sena 08:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with Gandhism/Lage Raho Munna Bhai. Not much notability beyond the film. utcursch | talk 12:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No notability beyond the film. -- Ranvir Sena 12:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge in line with Avoid neologisms. -Classicfilms 16:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Note:Merge !vote restored after it was removed by Ranvir Sena
 * Strong keep Yes it is a neologism. But that does not make the article unacceptable per se. It is verifiable from reliable sources. There are articles in newspapers and other media on Gandhigiri, not only using the term Gandhigiri. Avoid neologism states exactly that. --Dwaipayan (talk) 19:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Sarvagnya Harlowraman 21:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Keep just look at the news articles from all sections of society after release of film, It is true that it was an after effect of the film, but terms gandhigiri infuse so much confidence in many people that they were able to fight and get justice Zareef Ahmed 04:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)