Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Gandour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one Wikipedia article links to this one. There *might* be one article on Google that can be used for a reference. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 06:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  06:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  06:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  06:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  06:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I'm undecided because it seems a 158-year-old company should have more reliable sources than a quick search finds. This one reads more like a press release. And I'm not finding any others. Do we have a systemic bias issue limiting the availability of sources? I was sure I'd find a book or two mentioning a company of that age, but because I am limited to searching in English by my elementary abilities in other languages (and total lack of fluency in Arabic), I find nothing. So I lean toward deletion, but I'm not sure yet. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 21:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- entirely self-cited & no indications of notability or significance. I was not able to locate coverage that discusses the topic directly and in detail. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 15:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.