Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandra, Póvoa de Varzim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. If anyone disagrees, feel free to just revert this, but I don't see any reasonable prospect for a consensus to emerge to remove this. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Gandra, Póvoa de Varzim

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails general notability guideline. ltb d l (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Portugal. ltb d l (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The coordinates go to an entirely different place, Gandarinha. Geschichte (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Balazar. Coordinates revised. Gandra is a hamlet within the parish of Balazar; it's listed in that article. Portugese Wikipedia has nothing on it other than a link to Citypopulation.de. My view is that this would need to pass the GNG for a separate article as although populated it doesn't fulfil the legally recognised aspect of WP:NPLACE. Needs additional sources put forward to write something, otherwise it will remain a one sentence stub. Rupples (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be a census settlement per City Population would would mean it would probably pass GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 22:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It would be better to cite the census itself. Geschichte (talk) 10:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 13:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a clearly separate settlement so satisfies WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.