Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganesh Ayyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus herein is leaning toward article retention, although more input would have been ideal. Placing the Cleanup AfD template atop the article per the discussion herein. North America1000 00:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Ganesh Ayyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure puffery. "transformational thought leader" is pure jargon, and if that's what he's claimed to be,...

No evidence that he personally is responsible for any of the things listed here, the awards are as trivial as it gets. The refs are press releases  DGG ( talk ) 05:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#8213;  Padenton &#124;&#9993;  18:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Though article filled with too many WP:weasel and wp:peacock words but the subject is notable. Here are some of the citations that I found on him:, , , , , , .   Mr RD     10:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. He is the CEO of a listed firm. Article seems a little rushed and not linked to the the right references, can increase notability by adding in the right links. Dhiraj1984 (talk) 11:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Dhiraj1984

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience t 23:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe redirect to company - Searches here, here and here found several results which could make him notable but I'm not sure he's independently notable so maybe moving to the company's article is good. SwisterTwister   talk  06:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 23:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - seems to be notable, but this article is off to a bad start due to poor citations and puffery. Bearian (talk) 13:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.