Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganess Paudel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Ganess Paudel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet criteria of WP:NAUTHOR, he's only published one novel. The novel has been reviewed, but that's par for the course. A search of his name (including in Nepali) brings up mainly things that he's written. ... disco spinster   talk  17:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete New article about a Nepali language journalist and first time novelist with a new book out.  while I am willing to be persuaded by editors who have a reading knowledge of Nepali,  the first of the external links below - an interview about the new that ran in  the English language The Kathmandu Post, is all I can find in a language I read and it is not enough.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough rd-party source covering of him to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.