Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gang symbol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirected to gang signal -- nae'blis (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Gang symbol
Article fails to assert subect's notability. Also, seems to possibly fall under WP:NFT Seidenstud 06:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. However, someone could probably make a good article about the use/signifigance of gang symbols in general... Dgies 07:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * There is Gang signal.
 * Oh. How about replacing with a redirect then. 'Gang Symbol' is a more familiar term to me than 'Gang signal'. Dgies
 * Fine with me.--Chaser T 08:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Chaser T 08:11, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Gang signal, per the above. Tevildo 11:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Dgies. Oldelpaso 13:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Tevildo. -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 17:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Dgies. Srose (talk)  17:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per no claim to notability (and title having nothing to do with subject), redirect per above. Dgies makes an excellent point. (Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're probably going to say "this isn't one of those very special things for which that CSD criteria applies"... yawn.) Morgan Wick 19:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 00:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to gang signal like suggested. RFerreira 03:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.