Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangaram Nirvan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Gangaram Nirvan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing apart from this obituary. Fails WP:GNG. &#x222F; WBG converse 18:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 18:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 18:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  94rain  Talk 02:28, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

No publication avaialbe, but story is true. Indian Parliament is most important place for indians and you know Gangaram Nirvan is the person who forced indian government to establish Dr. Ambedkar's statue in Indian Parliament. this is notable thing that time. but no one published this story. Sunilbutolia (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)sunilbutolia
 * Delete you need sources to establish notability. Even with sources getting a statue erected is generally not enough to pass notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. People are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they lobbied for the creation of a statue. Literally nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but the referencing is a mix of unreliable sources (Blogspot, etc.) and glancing namechecks of his existence in news articles that aren't about him, so none of the sources get him over WP:GNG either. If "no one published this story", that in and of itself is precisely why it is not our job to publish this story either: our job is not to help you create the web presence of a person who didn't get any media coverage, it's to keep articles about people who got media coverage and not keep articles about people who didn't. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.