Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garbage Concern Welfare Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Garbage Concern Welfare Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability and considerable promotionalism. One of the "achievements" given is that "GCWS is listed on wikipedia as one of the notable NGOs in Mumbai, India". Good goals, no evidence of accomplishment.  DGG ( talk ) 23:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)  DGG ( talk ) 23:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No actual achievements or notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Non notable NGO. Safiel (talk) 23:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * comment Hold on with the delete..I guess a major issue here is that "Joseph2302" discovered that I created the article as a non-disclosed paid wiki writer. He has even nominated same article for Speedy deletion. I have already responded sincerely to him here. Editors please read my story here "[|ARE YOU BEING PAID TO CREATE ARTICLES]"  before arriving at the conclusion. Thanks Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 23:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * comment. Notice to all editors here! Joseph2302 the AFD nominator is taking this issue personal. He has nominated this same article for speedy deletion on the grounds of "undisclosed paid editing". He has really made me cry for the past 24 hours. I don't know why he's attacking all the pages I created so far. He nominated all of them for speedy deletion and then for AFD. There must be vested interest in his mind. I've already alerted Admins about this issue via the appropriate means. Thanks Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 03:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: When you come back from your block, among the several rules you should look up is WP:BOOMERANG, before you start flinging accusations about "vested interests" when you admit to being paid to create articles.  Nha Trang  Allons! 16:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable, promotional. BMK (talk) 04:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. Heavily promotional, without indication of successful results.  Better sources and a rewrite would probably change my view here.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hey, I have a "vested interest" too: it's in pitching NN articles that fail the GNG. This one does.  Nha Trang  Allons! 16:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable corpspam. — Brianhe (talk) 13:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - Promotional bollocks that belongs anywhere but here!. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as there isn't a sufficient amount of significant and in-depth coverage. This is a very good cause but it simply hasn't received the needed attention so there's not much. My searches found some of the same news results so it suggests this hasn't received that much attention. SwisterTwister   talk  05:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.