Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garden window


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Garden window

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, also WP:NAD Enwebb (talk) 05:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable topic. WP:NAD is irrelevant as, per WP:DICDEF, this is a stub, not a dictionary entry. Andrew D. (talk) 13:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks a bit ridiculous now, but common architectural elements can generally sustain a short article (although those tend to be weakly referenced - see e.g. dado (architecture) or stoop (architecture)). Search results do show abundant use of the term. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Uncertain See sash window and bay window for individual window articles. Article has been converted to meaningless or even inaccurate redirects (not a window box) which don't contain information about the topic, and most of the edits to revert to something of a stub have mainly been to see what the editors do with the topic in general. John Moser (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable as demonstrated in sources; one reference has been added. A merge into and redirect to Window would be a possibility, if the article is not expanded in the future. Sam Sailor 22:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.