Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Cousins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Gareth Cousins

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No claim of notability and no evidence of same beyond what could largely be garnered from IMDB. Mangoe (talk) 16:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete—On reading the bio I swore I've participated in a deletion discussion about this person, but I think it's just similar circumstances—personnel attached to many notable projects, with very little indication they are notable themselves. I found a smattering of sources, e.g., but none that rise to the level of a significant secondary source from a known publication. Searching EBSCO and ProQuest only turned up glancing mentions that don't tell us anything the liner notes do. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 10:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete There is only one credible source cited, this Variety article https://variety.com/2014/film/news/gravity-frozen-game-of-thrones-top-cinema-audio-society-awards-1201117161/  but his name is mentioned in a tangential way and he is not discussed in any length. With a lack of credible independent sources, this fails WP:GNG PaulPachad (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.