Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth brown

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:24, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gareth brown
vanity/promo. Nateji77 14:25, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Will be happy with whatever Wikipedia moderators decide I have just taken a more detailed look at your deletion policy and have read what you mean by 'Not yet/non notable' and fully admit that it would be rather pointless for me to even attempt to disagree with it being notable or not. I understand given the nature of the article and it's subject [I] that it's hardly of the utmost important it be kept up, so I will be fine with whatever you decide to do with it given the article's admittable obscurity. Apologies. ---Gareth Brown 18:00 June 6th 2005
 * Indifferent, but wouldn't mind it staying Hello, I thought I'd better do the right thing by signing up so I could explain. This wasn't actually written by me, but by a rather zealous friend of mine, who's got a bit ahead of himself writing about a website that isn't even open yet. I quite like it, the website will be up soon and more people will find and view it but surely that will give this article more reason to stick around. It is quite genuine, however I didn't write it but accept responsibility for it if I must and would have no problem if Wikipedia sees it necessary that it comes down. ---Gareth Brown 08:26, June 6 2005
 * Keep I feel it should be kept. Where's the harm in letting everyone know who the guy is? With all due respect I feel the word 'Vanity' is unfairly placed since no-one knows whether it was Mr Brown himself who actually wrote the article and not a friend/colleague/etc. Please give this some consideration. --James O'Connell. Bristol, England - 02:00 GMT, 6th June 2005
 * Delete ditto--Sophitus 15:24, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, and that is one silly email address. --Etacar11 23:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 09:45, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and thanks for registering and explaining Gareth. – Quoth 07:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not yet notable, follows Geogre's law, as well. RickK 07:44, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete drini &#9742; 17:15, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.