Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garfish Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Garfish Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find anything in-depth and the official website looks like it redirects to something other than the company (defunct?). CNMall41 (talk) 19:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- A7 material while also managing to be promotional: "Richard Berg, the CEO, is most famous for inventing the voice..." (??). K.e.coffman (talk) 03:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with fellow editors and believe this piece to fail WP:GNG, as well as being a case of WP:TOOSOON.V.Putnam (talk) 03:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as my nomination. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   13:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.