Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garg (Gaargya)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Garg (Gaargya)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has no indication of notability, and has been tagged as unreferenced for 2 years. I think the intention of the title, which looks like a disambiguation, is to indicate an alternative spelling. If not deleted, the article should be moved to a more appropriate title. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Lack of participation.
 * A more appropriate title would be Garg (gotra). I don't know anything about notability in the topic area, but quite a few of the incoming links to Garg and Garga are intended for it, so apparently editors have regularly presumed it notable. The article used to have more content in the past, but that got removed, quite rightly, as unreliably sourced, and there was some more content, equally unreliable, in an old revision of Garg . – Uanfala (talk) 15:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 桜 c) 16:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting one more time.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  14:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No references. Also anyone can't add reliable sources because no reference available on the internet for the lead section of article. GargAvinash (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.