Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargolas, Vol. 3 (Alex Gargolas album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Alex Gargolas. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS or WP:GNG. Redirect to Alex Gargolas  SilkTork  *Tea time 23:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Gargolas, Vol. 3 (Alex Gargolas album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Album with no evidence of notability. Albacore (talk) 21:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Albacore (talk) 11:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep major retailers sell the album, but few reviews. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I was about to say merge to artist article per WP:NALBUM, but is Alex Gargolas notable? Because there is no indication of it in the article. If not, then all those articles, Alex Gargolas and his albums, should be up for deletion, not just this one.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 14:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral I don't see much point in nominating just one of his numeous albuls like this. Either he's notable or not and that should determine whether the albums stay or go.  I'm inclined to say he's at least slightly notable, as a major label subsidiary released this compilation with his name in the title as a selling point, so he's not a total nobody.  Still needs major sourcing and so on, but there's a hint that there's some core of notability there. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep - per HHaeyyn89.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.