Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garnet Stevens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Garnet Stevens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Only has one source, which is insufficient to establish notability per WP:N, and there is minimal coverage of the athlete online amongst reputable sources. Therefore, there is no feasible means to enhance the article, so it is redundant and fails on grounds of notability completely in my view. Stormy clouds (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 22:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:NSPORT, the Pan Ams are an event where one would have to medal to qualify for an article on that basis, not just to be there at all as with the Olympics — but other than the PanAms, this just generically says that he competed at other international competitions without actually specifying which ones or suggesting that he won any, the single primary source present here doesn't verify any competitions (not even the PanAms) at all either, and there are no other sources being cited here to get him over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and insult to injury his name appears to be misspelled in the article. (Garnett) SportingFlyer (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * delete Simply competing at the Pan-Ams is not enough to show notability and he fails to meet the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.