Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrett Broshuis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 14:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Garrett Broshuis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Broshuis is not notable as a baseball player and I'm not sure if his off-field work is enough for his article to pass WP:GNG. For what it's worth, it appears that the article was created by a single-purpose account, Gbro43, that may be connected to the subject. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northern Antarctica (₵) 22:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non notable individual.. And the screen name of the original page author leads me to believe that Broshuis (or someone representing him) set this page up as self promotion. Spanneraol (talk) 14:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I want to look a little more, but I am leaning keep on this one. His minor league career by itself does not seem to rise to meet notability, but he received significant coverage in at least one reliable source (one that is available on Google) as an amateur.  .  That in itself is of course not enough, especially since it is one source, not multiple sources.  And he has received some significant coverage for his post-baseball career, ,  and  small bits here and here.  So I see him close to meeting WP:GNG without even counting his minor league career.  And while the coverage a minor leaguer typically gets is not enough by itself to meet notability, he certainly would have gotten some coverage as a minor league player with some possibility of attaining the majors, and doesn't need much more coverage, if any, to meet WP:GNG.  And it appears that he at least received some coverage in the 2006 Baseball America Prospect Handbook . So I am thinking that he probably meets WP:GNG. Rlendog (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBASEBALL and WP:GNG. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.