Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gartner equation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  22:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Gartner equation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

hoax- this is not one of maxwell's equations. check google, nothing like this comes up for "gartner equation." also, it was added by a user named gartner23 with no previous edit history. Calliopejen 14:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and rather speedily as nonsense. BTW, there is an electrochemical Gärtner equation, but it si not the one her and not yet in WP.--Tikiwont 19:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, nonsense. This is one of Maxwell's equations - it's listed at Maxwell's equations as Gauss's law for magnetism - but "Gartner equation" is not an alternate name. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 21:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article is possible hoax (the content, about the name), but the Gartner equation (Gärtner equation) exists and ISBN: 0471647497 (find chapter: 4.3.5.2 Steady-State photocurrents) in the book Impedance spectroscopy: theory, experiment, and applications (The Library of Congress). I'm not an expert and I did not find the form of equation, so I can not push my opinion --MaNeMeBasat 16:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed as well, but deleting this article now does not prevent anyone from creating later an article on the Gärtner equation, maybe even with with a possible alternative spelling redirect from Gartner equation. Not deleting it, on the other hand, would keep the nonsense around in the edit history. --Tikiwont 16:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So, if the recreation of the article with the proper content is possible later on (and redirect with proper name Gärtner equation), then I'm voting for delete. --MaNeMeBasat 16:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax. Spacepotato 23:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.