Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garuda Aerospace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The on,y policy based arguments are for deletion. NCORP is not satisfied. Courcelles (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Garuda Aerospace

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable start up, coverage is limited to funding announcements. Gsearch goes straight to company profiles and social media. Oaktree b (talk) 12:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 12:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Aviation. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I was able to find a business today article and a economic times article on this company. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep I found them on BBC Today (YouTube) and all over MSN. Spaceeditor123 (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I found this title notable as it has enough good references on trusted websites. The company was inaugurated by Prime minister Narendra Modi and Mahendra Singh Dhoni is the brand ambassador.Alamaflin (talk) 07:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alamaflin (talk • contribs) 07:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Further analysis of whether the sources meet WP:NCORP would be helpful. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above and i found this. Chennai Super Kings onboards drone tech startup Garuda Aerospace. FXBeats21 (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as articles that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews, website information, etc - even when slightly modified. If it isn't *clearly* showing independent content then it fails ORGIND. Here, the references are simply regurgitating company announcements and have no "Independent Content" in the form of independent analysis/fact checking/opinion/etc. I'd invite any of the Keep !voters above to indicate the particular paragraphs in whatever sources meet CORPDEPTH/ORGIND.  HighKing++ 19:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Further analysis of sources as follows:
 * Forbes India article interviews various executives connected with the drone market in India including the CEO of the topic company. The article relies entirely on information provided by the CEO and the company for the purposes of the article and does not contain an "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * Indian Express article is based entirely on a company announcement to set up a factory in Malaysia. There are numerous articles regurgitating the same information, fails ORGIND
 * The Hindu article is based entirely on the announcement of their sponsorship of the Chennai Super Kings, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * This Hindau article is also based entirely on an announcement of plans to raise funding, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * This Hindu article is based on an announcement of having raised funding, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * This India Express article is another regurgitated announcement about how a former cricketer, Dhoni, invested in the "start-up" company and become their brand ambassador. Fails ORGIND
 * Government of India Press Release, not "Independent Content".
 * Another Hindu article where the CEO tells the journalist of their road-map and plans. No "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * Hindu BusinessLine article with yet-more-regurgitated information directly from the CEO, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND
 * Another Hindu article, same result. Garuda CEO must have these guys on a speed dial. No "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. I think I'll shorten that to NICFO, my fingers are getting tired.  HighKing++ 19:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * India Times also publishing info directly provided by the company/CEO. NICFO.
 * Another Hindu, same result, NICFO.
 * Another Government Press Release. NICFO.
 * New Indian Express article based on interviewing a young student drone pilot who works with the topic company. Also features the mandatory interview with the CEO. NICFO
 * WION article where the company talks about looking forward to being a Unicorn one day. NICFO
 * Tech Circle article based entirely on a company announcement. NICFO
 * While I think the topic company's PR department are doing a great job and the CEO is wheeled out at every opportunity, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. The only people talking about this company are themselves. Recent analyst research reports into the Drone market in India either do not mention the company or do not provide sufficient in-depth information on the company. A case of WP:TOOSOON at best.  HighKing++ 19:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.