Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary A. Olson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. I don't see any elaboration on the copyvio claim, but if it is, please tag the article with copyvio. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-28 10:51Z 

Gary A. Olson

 * — (View AfD)

Written entirely by one editor who worked on no other pages. Probably vanity, questionable notability. Djcartwright 05:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - easily passes WP:PROF. Otto4711 07:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Otto4711 and re: "written by one editor who worked on no other pages", while I realize that such a thing CAN imply a sockpuppet or a vanity piece, it's not an a priori given without looking at the specific edits made. Assume good faith and Please do not bite the newcomers seem to apply here lacking any other information.  -Markeer 13:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Apologies, if I am botching any WP conventions; this is my first WP entry. I was researching Stanley Fish and wanted to connect that entry with a closely related figure. So, this is not a vanity piece in that the subject did not post it. I hope/think I followed the WP guidelines per neutrality, verifiability, etc. If not, I would be happy to make changes.  Twtaylor 16:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It appears that the individual is rather notable though the article needs to be heavily wikified and cited in a more proper manner. --The Way 07:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if Wikified, new editors tend to forget that they are not writing an essay Alf photoman 14:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete on basis that it is clearly a WP:COPYVIO Fabhcún 20:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Question How is this clearly a copywrite violation? --The Way 21:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * keep and clean up, if there is a copywrite violation as Fabhcun says there is, then that should be taken care of ASAP. Davidpdx 12:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.