Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Bryan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Gary Bryan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable radio personality. While he has a history is the business, the references I'm finding are trivial "Gary Bryan is not doing mornings on KXXX" type of articles. Not the kind of significant coverage WP:BIO insists on. Tagged with reference concerns since Feb 2008, it seems unlikely that sufficent references are going to be added. Rtphokie (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment seems like just another deejay Ohconfucius (talk) 04:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This article needs a ton of work but there are sufficient non-trivial sources from The New York Times, New York Daily News , Orange County Register , and other places that a useful article about this notable radio figure can be salvaged from the wreckage. Plenty of sources exist that go mostly to verifiability, too. - Dravecky (talk) 21:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Update I've just finished an initial overhaul of this article including wikification and integration of the references I mentioned above. There's certain;y more that could be done to improve this article but given his career, his recognition from the NAB, and these non-trivial references I feel strongly that Bryan meets the notability standards. - Dravecky (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article has improved considerably and now clearly meets the requirements of our notability guideline.--ragesoss (talk) 20:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has improved (though it still requires major cleaning), and I think it fits WP:N reasonably well now. IceUnshattered (talk) 01:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article satisfies notability guidelines and has multiple third party sources for verification.Nrswanson (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.