Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Chapman (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Tito xd (?!?) 00:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Gary Chapman (author)
Fails to meet WP:BIO and appears to be vanity since it is missing WP:V. An56 05:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable per Google (179,000 hits, 492 unique). His book has an Amazon sales rank of 61. --Coredesat talk 06:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Coredesat. (Amazon sales rank is 61 now, 2 hours later?) —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-29 08:29Z 
 * Comment Er, whoops, that was a mistake. It's 61, up from 71. --Coredesat talk 10:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep a poor article at present, but the subject is certainly notable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  09:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A crappy article is worthy of a tag rather than a AfD. Ifnord 19:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It needs to cite it's sources, though. Black-Velvet  18:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.