Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary E. Martin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Gary E. Martin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

1. Article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline WP:BIO - multiple published secondary sources which are reliable 1.1 a single secondary source, other refs are primary Widefox (talk) 15:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Object: this article should definitely not be deleted as this scientist is one of the most eminent scientists in the field of small molecule structure elucidation and I would like to invite the editor who flagged this for deletion to read one of the author's experiences writing about this article at http://www.chemconnector.com/2011/11/17/why-are-pornstars-more-notable-than-scientists-on-wikipedia/. Drdee (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Someone whose work is cited in over 2000 scholarly publications is certainly notable. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 13:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Mietchen. Walkerma (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The citation record here is good enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep publication and citation record satisfies WP:PROF point 1. As a distinguished fellow of Merck Research Laboratories they also satisfy point 5. Polyamorph (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.