Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Glassman (dentist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Gary Glassman (dentist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no major awards or positions. Fellowships in his organizations are usual for specialists, not high honors. I can find a few publications in Google Scholar : citation count of the highest, 63, 42, 30, 30, 28, 9. These citation counts are not significant in a biomedical science. Except for one review article, not in any of the major journals in the field, like JADA.

The purported references are trivial PR & advertorials. I assume COI is likely, since the contributor has written no other article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable dentist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, supposedly a "leading endodontist" in one of Canada's largest cities, although the sourcing is terrible. Bearian (talk) 01:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Weak only because the subject is covered somewhat in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.