Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary L. Keady


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete for now. If someone wants to work on this let me know and I'll be glad to userfy or incubate it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Gary_L._Keady

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable as per WP:BIO, Google returns nothing that establishes notability and four of the first five results are Wikipedia pages. Two of the three references are currently Wikipedia articles, and the only non-Wikipedia reference is an article about Australia's National Rugby League, and doesn't mention Gary L. Keady or anything relevant to him in any way. SudoGhost (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The AfD is malformed, although WP doesn't care about underline, google does. Eduemoni↑talk↓  21:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Be bold in editing! Killiondude (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)



 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is it so difficult to find out about Australians with a g-search? Which best database for Australian news coverage??  It seems he can be more easily found (at least north of the equator) if one leaves out the "L".   He did receive the one nomination by the Australian Film Institute in 1989 for Best Achievement in Costume Design for Sons of Steel.  But it's gonna take a lot of digging to support even a part of this BLP.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:20, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is a mass of COI OR. As it stands IMO this mustly unsourced BLP should be deleted. It can be replaced with a redirect to his film till sources about him emerge. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Poorly sourced and seems to fail wp:bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplepox01 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.