Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Whitford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Gary Whitford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A biography created in 2005, sourced only to a personal website and (added by me) to IMDb; neither of which is WP:RS. I recently deleted a link to a dead YouTube video; a more recent attempt by an IP to add two spammy-looking YouTube videos was reverted by User:XLinkBot. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 06:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete This is the most crazy long lasting of a virtually unsourced article I have seen. 15 years without even IMDb is an outrage. This person is clearly not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely zero reliable sources. Not only does a Google News search not not yield any articles on the individual, but the individual isn't even mentioned whatsoever. I haven't seen a less notable BLP in my life. Hillelfrei  • talk •  16:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about him. Easily fails WP:GNG. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. On a similar note, I couldn't find any notable sources. Clearly fails any sensible notability gauge. PK650 (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Neither WP:GNG nor WP:NACTOR is met. Very little of the article's content can be verified. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.