Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gas-fired infrared heater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Speedy delete under WP:CSD. See also admission by author of original research.' – B.hotep'' •talk• 08:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Gas-fired infrared heater

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I believe we have no speedy criteria for this (yet). This seems like an essay paper. None of this is encyclopedic; it describes heat and temperature and conduction and the like... no need for definitions here. The page is being nominated primarily because there is no context to describe the topic; it all appears to be original research. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as vandalism and probable copyvio - see the editor's other activities and in particular this diff
 * Note: the author admits that it's original research - see here. andy (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Can't it be speedied, then? &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not if it's WP:OR. Could be speedied per A10 though - I've tried this with the identical article Gas-fired infrared heaters andy (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. db-a10 applies - duplicates existing articles. &mdash; RHaworth 17:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Created by a single-purpose account which has repeatedly vandalized infrared heater. This article has almost nothing to say about its putative topic; if it did have anyt substantial content, it would be a duplicate of material already in context at infrared heater. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Added speedy a10 tag. Originally I added speedy to the other article (with a10 as the reason) because it looked like this account created both. Weird. Anyway, that one looks good now so clearly this needs to be deleted. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.